Aviation Glass Case Study: From 20-Minute Manual Inspections to Real-Time AI QC

August 5, 2025
Latest News
Aircraft cabin interior featuring Aviation Glass LED-backlit ceiling panels with airplane-silhouette pattern—products inspected by Spectron™ AI for micro-defects

The Challenge

Aviation Glass (AG) produces high-tech glass for aircraft interiors where an invisible scratch today could become tomorrow’s safety hazard. They needed to:

  • Accelerate inspection without compromising quality
  • Reduce manual-inspection labour costs
  • Turn raw defect data into actionable process improvements, and
  • Capture a full digital record of every panel

Why Spectron™

By deploying Zetamotion’s Spectron™ platform, AG moved from batch-based manual checks to in-line, AI-powered inspection. Spectron now scans each panel in seconds, not 20+ minutes , while its human-in-the-loop workflow lets engineers override, comment, and feed corrections back into the model for continuous learning.


Results at a Glance

KPIPerformanceImpact
Inspection cycle time20 + min → Seconds-99 %
Annual hours spent inspecting1 200 + hrs savedLabour re-allocated
Product variants covered46 variantsSeamless scalability
Yield improvement+ 5 %Higher throughput
Detection accuracy99.99 %Fewer false rejects

Visual Insights

Line chart comparing defect-prioritisation feedback (orange) and defect-clarification feedback (purple) across 40 time units; prioritisation feedback peaks early and declines.
Human feedback falls as Spectron™ learns, cutting clarification loops.
Line chart plotting frequency of defect Types 1–3 over 40 time units, with a mid-run spike in Type 2 defects.
Mid-run spike in Type 2 anomalies flagged—and fixed—in under a day.

What the data says

  • Type 2 defects dominate—63.5 % of all findings—pinpointing where engineers must focus root-cause analysis.
  • Early human feedback sessions were intense but tapered off as Spectron’s accuracy climbed, showing successful knowledge capture.
  • A mid-run spike in Type 2 anomalies prompted a quick camera-resolution upgrade that restored stability in < 24 hours .
Pie chart showing defect detection percentages: Type 2 63.5 %, Type 3 34 %, Type 1 2.5 %.
Type 2 issues dominate early inspections, guiding improvement focus.

Lessons Learned

  1. Agree on defect taxonomy first. Aligning on what “good” looks like reduced supply-chain friction
  2. Pair AI with human expertise. Spectron’s feedback loop kept rare but critical defect phenotypes in view
  3. Design for adaptability. A one-day camera upgrade proved the platform’s flexibility to evolving specs

Ready to Raise Your Own Quality Bar?